Moody v. Burrell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Moody v. Burrell

146 S.E. 753, 167 Ga. 834, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 44

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 13, 1929·No. No. 6686·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

Upon conflicting evidence the judge did not err in denying an interlocutory injunction and in dissolving the temporary restraining order. Johnson v. Cantrell, 150 Ga. 114 (102 S. E. 821); Stephens v. Fitzgerald, 161 Ga. 842 (131 S. E. 885); Gray v. Chason, 158 Ga. 313 (123 S. E. 290). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. J. G. & H. E. Edwards, for plaintiff. McMillan & Erwin, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

Upon conflicting evidence the judge did not err in denying an interlocutory injunction and in dissolving the temporary restraining order. Johnson v. Cantrell, 150 Ga. 114 (102 S. E. 821); Stephens v. Fitzgerald, 161 Ga. 842 (131 S. E. 885); Gray v. Chason, 158 Ga. 313 (123 S. E. 290). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. J. G. & H. E. Edwards, for plaintiff. McMillan & Erwin, for defendant.

Moody v. Burrell, 146 S.E. 753, 167 Ga. 834, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 44 (Ga. 1929).

Pincite

146 S.E. 753 (Moody v. Burrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related