Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. Bowers

14 F.3d 572, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3156, 1994 WL 29904
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. Bowers. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 F.3d 1494
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 4, 1994·No. 91-8002·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION OF REHEARING EN BANC

(Panel Opinion November 3, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993, 7 F.3d 1543)

Feb. 4, 1994.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. *

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en bane, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. Bowers, 14 F.3d 572, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3156, 1994 WL 29904 (11th Cir. 1994).

14 F.3d 572 (Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. Bowers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related