Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. Bowers

Eleventh Circuit

Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. Bowers

14 F.3d 572, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3156, 1994 WL 29904

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 4, 1994

Docket91-8002

StatusPublished

This text of 14 F.3d 572 (Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. Bowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. Bowers, 14 F.3d 572, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3156, 1994 WL 29904 (11th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION OF REHEARING EN BANC

(Panel Opinion November 3, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993, 7 F.3d 1543)

Feb. 4, 1994.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. *

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en bane, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI