Stenger v. Roeder

29 P. 211, 3 Wash. 412, 1892 Wash. LEXIS 99
Washington Supreme Court·Decided January 4, 1892·No. No. 240·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

This was’an action to enjoin the execution of a deed of real estate, alleged to have been sold by the marshal of the city of Whatcom, for non-payment of certain [413]*413taxes, and to set aside the certificates given by the marshal showing the aforesaid sale. Upon the final hearing, the relief prayed for was granted by the court below, and the case has been brought here upon the pleadings and findings of the superior court, without the testimony.

Under the ruling in Enos v. Wilcox, ante, p. 44, this court cannot review the case under these circumstances, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Anders, O. J., and Hoyt, Scott and Dunbar, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stenger v. Roeder, 29 P. 211, 3 Wash. 412, 1892 Wash. LEXIS 99 (Wash. 1892).

29 P. 211 (Stenger v. Roeder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Northeast Transportation Co. v. Superior Court
77 P.2d 1012 (Washington Supreme Court, 1938)
Caughey v. Rien
79 P. 925 (Washington Supreme Court, 1905)
Nelson v. Seattle Traction Co.
66 P. 61 (Washington Supreme Court, 1901)
Bently v. Port Townsend Hotel & Improvement Co.
32 P. 1072 (Washington Supreme Court, 1893)