Caton v. Switzler

13 P. 712, 3 Wash. Terr. 242, 1887 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 29
CourtWashington Territory
DecidedJanuary 5, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 13 P. 712 (Caton v. Switzler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Territory primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caton v. Switzler, 13 P. 712, 3 Wash. Terr. 242, 1887 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 29 (Wash. Super. Ct. 1887).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Greene

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an equity cause decided upon the merits in the lower court, and brought up here under the appeal act of 1883.

What purports to be a statement of facts is included in the transcript, but it is not such a statement as is contemplated and prescribed by that act, for it does not appear to have been made up with the knowledge of, and it is conceded to have been made without notice to, the appellee. Such being the posture of the case, the motion to affirm the judgment of the District Court is granted.

Hoyt, J., and Turner, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Northeast Transportation Co. v. Superior Court
77 P.2d 1012 (Washington Supreme Court, 1938)
Frost v. Mighetto
71 P.2d 932 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
Hammell v. Superior Court
17 P.2d 101 (California Supreme Court, 1932)
Stenger v. Roeder
29 P. 211 (Washington Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 P. 712, 3 Wash. Terr. 242, 1887 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caton-v-switzler-washterr-1887.