Steele v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Steele v. State

1923 OK CR 320, 219 P. 429, 25 Okla. Crim. 226, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 38

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 12, 1923

DocketNo. A-4292.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1923 OK CR 320 (Steele v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steele v. State, 1923 OK CR 320, 219 P. 429, 25 Okla. Crim. 226, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 38 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the county court of Major county, wherein, on the 15th day of December, 1921, plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and sentenced as above indicated. Petition in error and case-made were filed in this court on April 12, 1922, 118 days after the rendition of the judgment. ' No order of the trial court appears of record extending the time to take the appeal beyond the1 60 days allowed by statute in misdemeanor eases. Unless such extension is made by the trial court this court acquires no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Danna v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 114, 180 Pac. 869; Krivanek v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 172, 144 Pac. 188.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the county court of Major county, wherein, on the 15th day of December, 1921, plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and sentenced as above indicated. Petition in error and case-made were filed in this court on April 12, 1922, 118 days after the rendition of the judgment. ' No order of the trial court appears of record extending the time to take the appeal beyond the1 60 days allowed by statute in misdemeanor eases. Unless such extension is made by the trial court this court acquires no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Danna v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 114, 180 Pac. 869; Krivanek v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 172, 144 Pac. 188.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK CR 320, 219 P. 429, 25 Okla. Crim. 226, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steele-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack