Danna v. State

1919 OK CR 171, 180 P. 869, 16 Okla. Crim. 114, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMay 20, 1919
DocketNo. A-3065.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 1919 OK CR 171 (Danna v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Danna v. State, 1919 OK CR 171, 180 P. 869, 16 Okla. Crim. 114, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

MATS'ON, J.

Plaintiff in error, Frank Danna, was convicted in the county court of Choctaw county of the crime off unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquors from one • point in said county to another point therein, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail *115 for a period of six months and to pay a fine of $500 and the -costs of the action.

To reverse this judgment, an appeal was attempted to be made by filing in this court on the 5th day of July, 1917, a petition in error with case-made attached. The judgment of conviction was rendered on the 20th day of April, 1917.

Section 5991, Revised Laws 1910, provides:

“In misdemeanor cases the appeal must be taken within sixty days after the judgment is rendered: Provided, however, that the trial court or judge may. for good cause shown, extend the time in which such appeal may be taken not exceeding sixty days.”

A careful examination of the case-made fails to disclose that the trial court or judge made any order extending the time in which to perfect the appeal beyond the statutory period of 60 days. This court has uniformly held that the appeal must be perfected within the time prescribed by the statute where no order extending such time has been made; otherwise, this court does not acquire jurisdiction to review the judgment. Krivanek v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 172, 144 Pac. 188.

For the reasons stated, the purported appeal is dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with directions to enforce its judgment.

DOYLE, P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bowling
1928 OK CR 308 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1928)
Steen v. State
1923 OK CR 319 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1923)
Steele v. State
1923 OK CR 320 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1923)
Carroll v. State
1923 OK CR 248 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1923)
Allen v. State
1923 OK CR 249 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1923)
Wilson v. State
1923 OK CR 234 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1923)
Reed v. State
1922 OK CR 118 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 171, 180 P. 869, 16 Okla. Crim. 114, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danna-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.