Steele v. Employment Department

974 P.2d 207, 328 Or. 292
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 11, 1999
DocketS43737
StatusPublished

This text of 974 P.2d 207 (Steele v. Employment Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steele v. Employment Department, 974 P.2d 207, 328 Or. 292 (Or. 1999).

Opinion

974 P.2d 207 (1999)
328 Or. 292

David J. STEELE, Respondent on Review,
v.
EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, Petitioner on Review, and
Faris Sheet Metal, Respondent.

EAB 95-AB-877, CA A89252; SC S43737.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted September 8, 1997.
Decided February 11, 1999.

Jas. Adams, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Gerald Brask, Jr., Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, and DURHAM, Justices.[**]

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court.

143 Or.App. 105, 923 P.2d 1252 (1996)

NOTES

[**] Fadeley, J., retired January 31, 1998, and did not participate in this decision; Graber, J., resigned March 31, 1998; Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steele v. Employment Department
923 P.2d 1252 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
Steele v. Employment Department
974 P.2d 207 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
974 P.2d 207, 328 Or. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steele-v-employment-department-or-1999.