Steefel v. Commissioner

8 B.T.A. 1111, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2722
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedOctober 31, 1927
DocketDocket No. 18708.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 B.T.A. 1111 (Steefel v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steefel v. Commissioner, 8 B.T.A. 1111, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2722 (bta 1927).

Opinion

opinion.

Van Fossan :

This proceeding is submitted upon the pleadings and stipulation filed, the sole iss’ue for decision being whether or not the petitioner is entitled to a 25 per cent reduction under sections 1200 [1112]*1112and 1201 of the Revenue Act of 1924 in the tax due at 1923 rates on that portion of said partnership profits distributable to the petitioner on January 31, 1924, and reported by the petitioner in his income-tax return for the calendar year 1924.

The facts, in all essential respects, and the question involved in this case are identical with those considered in Appeal of Charles Colip, 5 B. T. A. 123, and upon the authority of that decision.

Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

Considered by MaRquette, Phillips, and Milliken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steefel v. Commissioner
8 B.T.A. 1111 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 B.T.A. 1111, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steefel-v-commissioner-bta-1927.