Home/Court of Appeals of North Carolina/Steed v. Cranford

Steed v. Cranford

172 S.E.2d 211, 7 N.C. App. 382, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1694
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Steed v. Cranford. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 N.C. App. 378 →
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided February 25, 1970·No. No. 7019SC53·Published

Opinion

Campbell, J.

This is a companion case to “Ruth Morris Steed v. Carson Clark Cranford” decided this same day.

[383]*383The facts in this case and in the Ruth, Morris Steed case are exactly the same insofar as material, the only difference being that in this case, Mark Steven Steed was the driver of the Chevrolet automobile owned by his mother, the plaintiff in the other case, Ruth Morris Steed. In this case Mark Steven Steed seeks to recover damages for personal injuries.

Nothing would be gained by repetition, and on authority of Ruth Morris Steed v. Carson Clark Cranford the order of Judge Lupton, in all respects, is

Affirmed.

PARKER and HedricK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steed v. Cranford, 172 S.E.2d 211, 7 N.C. App. 382, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1694 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).

172 S.E.2d 211 (Steed v. Cranford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.