Steed v. Cranford

172 S.E.2d 211, 7 N.C. App. 382, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1694
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 25, 1970
DocketNo. 7019SC53
StatusPublished

This text of 172 S.E.2d 211 (Steed v. Cranford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steed v. Cranford, 172 S.E.2d 211, 7 N.C. App. 382, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1694 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

Campbell, J.

This is a companion case to “Ruth Morris Steed v. Carson Clark Cranford” decided this same day.

[383]*383The facts in this case and in the Ruth, Morris Steed case are exactly the same insofar as material, the only difference being that in this case, Mark Steven Steed was the driver of the Chevrolet automobile owned by his mother, the plaintiff in the other case, Ruth Morris Steed. In this case Mark Steven Steed seeks to recover damages for personal injuries.

Nothing would be gained by repetition, and on authority of Ruth Morris Steed v. Carson Clark Cranford the order of Judge Lupton, in all respects, is

Affirmed.

PARKER and HedricK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 S.E.2d 211, 7 N.C. App. 382, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steed-v-cranford-ncctapp-1970.