Steamboat City v. Matthews

28 Mo. 248
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMarch 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 28 Mo. 248 (Steamboat City v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steamboat City v. Matthews, 28 Mo. 248 (Mo. 1859).

Opinion

Napton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case falls within the principle decided by this court in McAfee v. Ryan, 11 Mo. 365. The instructions were not excepted to, and indeed are admitted to bo a correct exposition of the law applicable to the facts in evidence. All the testimony was on one side, but the jury disregarded it, and the circuit court, who heard the witnesses, sanctioned the verdict of the jury. We must infer from this that the circuit court was satisfied with the course of the jury. The credit due to witnesses is a matter peculiarly for [249]*249a jury, and any control over tbe finding of a jury in this respect could bardly be judiciously exercised by this court, which, possesses no means of forming a correct opinion, and must be guided altogether by what appears on the face of the record. The circuit judge would not of course permit a verdict to stand against his own instructions, and as that court has virtually certified to us that the verdict was right we can not interfere. The cases of the State v. Packwood, 26 Mo. 340, and Phillips v. Riley, 27 Mo. 386, stand upon different principles. The other judges concurring, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gebby v. Carrillo
177 P. 894 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1918)
Guthrie v. Holmes
198 S.W. 854 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1917)
Peterson v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.
178 S.W. 182 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1915)
Asbill v. City of Joplin
124 S.W. 22 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
First National Bank v. Bennett
114 Mo. App. 691 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Dawson v. Wombles
86 S.W. 271 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
E. U. Hugumin & Co. v. Hinds
71 S.W. 479 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1902)
Weinberg v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
40 S.W. 882 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
Adams County Bank v. Hainline
67 Mo. App. 483 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1896)
Church v. Chicago & Alton Railroad
23 S.W. 1056 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
Hipsley v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad
88 Mo. 348 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1885)
Rosecrans v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.
83 Mo. 678 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Gregory v. Chambers
78 Mo. 294 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Cramer v. American Merchants Union Express Co.
56 Mo. 524 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Mo. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steamboat-city-v-matthews-mo-1859.