Staton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Staton v. State

715 So. 2d 330, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9595, 1998 WL 422759

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 29, 1998

DocketNo. 98-1220

StatusPublished

This text of 715 So. 2d 330 (Staton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Staton v. State, 715 So. 2d 330, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9595, 1998 WL 422759 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order by which the trial court summarily denied his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion and amended motion for correction of his sentence. His assertion that his convictions for first degree felonies were scored as life felonies on his sentencing guidelines seoresheet states a colorable claim for relief that has been neither previously ruled upon on the merits nor refuted by attachments to the trial court order. We accordingly reverse the order and remand this case to the trial court for attachment of a copy of that portion of the trial court files and records that conclusively shows that the appellant is entitled to no relief or for relief to be granted. The order is otherwise affirmed.

ALLEN, WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order by which the trial court summarily denied his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion and amended motion for correction of his sentence. His assertion that his convictions for first degree felonies were scored as life felonies on his sentencing guidelines seoresheet states a colorable claim for relief that has been neither previously ruled upon on the merits nor refuted by attachments to the trial court order. We accordingly reverse the order and remand this case to the trial court for attachment of a copy of that portion of the trial court files and records that conclusively shows that the appellant is entitled to no relief or for relief to be granted. The order is otherwise affirmed.

ALLEN, WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

715 So. 2d 330, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9595, 1998 WL 422759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staton-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.