Staton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Staton v. State

681 So. 2d 866, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10893, 1996 WL 596177

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Staton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 636 So. 2d 844 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 1996·No. No. 96-260·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the lower court’s adjudication of violation of community control or in the condition addressed to contact with children. However, to be consistent with the condition originally imposed, we limit the condition pertaining to employment to the requirement that Mr. Staton make a good faith effort to remain gainfully employed.

[867]*867AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the lower court’s adjudication of violation of community control or in the condition addressed to contact with children. However, to be consistent with the condition originally imposed, we limit the condition pertaining to employment to the requirement that Mr. Staton make a good faith effort to remain gainfully employed.

[867]*867AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Staton v. State, 681 So. 2d 866, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10893, 1996 WL 596177 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

681 So. 2d 866 (Staton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.