Staton v. Fought
486 So. 2d 745
Opinion
Bryan R. STATON and Phyllis P. Staton
v.
Don FOUGHT, Ernest Freyou, Al Guidry and Tim Trahan.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Granted. Instead of requiring an oath, the trial judge may permit the use of the following: "I, _______, do hereby declare that the facts I am about to give are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate, correct and complete."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Staton v. Fought, 486 So. 2d 745 (La. 1986).
486 So. 2d 745 (Staton v. Fought) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scott v. State
80 S.W.3d 184 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Society of Separationists, Inc. v. Guy Herman, Judge of the Travis County Court at Law
939 F.2d 1207 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
Betty Ann Ferguson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
921 F.2d 588 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
Kaltenbach v. Breaux
690 F. Supp. 1551 (W.D. Louisiana, 1988)