State-Wide Insurance v. Murdock

31 A.D.2d 978, 299 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4330
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 31, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 31 A.D.2d 978 (State-Wide Insurance v. Murdock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State-Wide Insurance v. Murdock, 31 A.D.2d 978, 299 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 (subd. [e]) to stay arbitration which respondent Murdock had demanded of petitioner and respondent Commercial Union Insurance Company, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 12, 1968, which granted respondents’ separate motions to confirm the report of a Special Referee, vacated a temporary stay of arbitration as between respondent Murdock and petitioner, and permanently stayed arbitration as between the two respondents. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with one bill of costs against respondents jointly; respondents’ said motions denied; arbitration as between respondent Murdock and petitioner permanently stayed; the temporary stay of arbitration as between respondents vacated; and arbitration shall proceed between respondents. In our opinion, where a panel truck had stalled and the operator had raised the hood of the motor to attempt to start the engine and a passenger alighted from the truck to walk toward the front [979]*979of the truck and was struck by a hit-and-run vehicle within four or five seconds after alighting from the truck, the passenger was “ occupying ” the truck within the meaning of section 617 of the Insurance Law and the New York Automoble Accident Indemnification Endorsement on the insurance policy which covered the truck and on the separate policy which covered the passenger. Beldock, P. J., Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur; Christ and Martuseello, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the order, on the opinion of the Special Term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v. Nakhla
140 A.D.3d 762 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
BOYSON, KAREN v. KWASOWSKY, IRENE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Boyson v. Kwasowsky
129 A.D.3d 151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Faragon v. American Home Assurance Co.
52 A.D.3d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Travelers Property Casualty Co. v. Landau
27 A.D.3d 477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Rowell v. Utica Mutual Insurance
571 N.E.2d 707 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Morris v. Continental Insurance Companies
594 N.E.2d 1106 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1991)
State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Antunovich
160 A.D.2d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Rose v. Allstate Insurance Co.
782 P.2d 19 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1989)
Colon v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
399 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Colon v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
64 A.D.2d 498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
In re the Arbitration between Williams
64 A.D.2d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Aetna Insurance v. Espinosa
92 Misc. 2d 200 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.D.2d 978, 299 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-wide-insurance-v-murdock-nyappdiv-1969.