State v. Young
This text of 528 N.W.2d 417 (State v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Jay YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
*394 For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there was a brief by Michael J. Steinle and Law Office of Michael J. Steinle, Milwaukee and oral argument by Michael J. Steinle.
For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle.
PER CURIAM.
The court is equally divided on the question of whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals. Justice DAY, Justice STEINMETZ, and Justice WILCOX would affirm; Chief Justice HEFFERNAN, Justice ABRAHAMSON, and Justice BABLITCH would reverse. Justice GESKE withdrew from participation.
Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
By the Court.The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
528 N.W.2d 417, 191 Wis. 2d 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-young-wis-1995.