State v. Young

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Young

136 P.3d 76, 206 Or. App. 229, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 735

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 31, 2006

Docket0506-66659; A129328

StatusPublished

This text of 136 P.3d 76 (State v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Young, 136 P.3d 76, 206 Or. App. 229, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 735 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence in the record is insufficient to establish that she is presently unable to provide for her own basic needs because of her mental disorder. ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence does not establish the grounds for the order of commitment that was entered in this case. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence in the record is insufficient to establish that she is presently unable to provide for her own basic needs because of her mental disorder. ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence does not establish the grounds for the order of commitment that was entered in this case. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 P.3d 76, 206 Or. App. 229, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-young-orctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack