State v. Young

200 S.E.2d 208, 19 N.C. App. 757, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1762
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 N.C. App. 316
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided November 14, 1973·No. No. 7326SC699·Published

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

A careful review of the record on appeal fails to disclose any error prejudicial to defendant. We conclude that he received a fair trial and the sentence imposed is well within the limits permitted by statute.

No error.

Judges Parker and Hedrick concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Young, 200 S.E.2d 208, 19 N.C. App. 757, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1762 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

200 S.E.2d 208 (State v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.