State v. Young

181 S.E.2d 261, 11 N.C. App. 440, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1555
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 N.C. App. 316
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided May 26, 1971·No. No. 715SC51·Published

Opinion

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant’s counsel states that he has carefully reviewed the record, but has been unable to find any prejudicial error therein. We have also examined the record and find no prejudicial error.

Defendant and his counsel signed a written waiver of indictment as G.S. 15-140.1 requires for trial upon an information. The information charged that defendant stole 34 men’s suits [441]*441of a value of $2,285.75 from Ketteridge Suit Market by breaking and entering. The State presented plenary evidence to support the charge. Police officers found defendant with the stolen suits at 3:00 a.m. in a station wagon parked near the side entrance to the premises which had been broken into and from which the suits had been removed without authority from the owner. Defendant testified, but apparently the jury did not accept his explanation.

In the trial and judgment appealed from we find

No error.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Vaughn concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Young, 181 S.E.2d 261, 11 N.C. App. 440, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1555 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

181 S.E.2d 261 (State v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.