State v. Young

945 S.W.2d 619, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 918
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 424
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 1997·No. Nos. 67797, 70285·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his jury conviction of three counts of rape in violation of § 566.030 RSMo 1994, three counts of sodomy in violation of § 566.060 RSMo 1994, one count of sexual assault in violation of 566.040 RSMo 1994, and one count of child abuse, in violation of § 569.060 RSMo 1994. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Young, 945 S.W.2d 619, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 918 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

945 S.W.2d 619 (State v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.