State v. Young

928 S.W.2d 405, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1513, 1996 WL 509977
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 424
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 10, 1996·No. No. 68034·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William Young, appeals the judgment of conviction for first degree robbery, RSMo § 569.020 (1994), and armed criminal action, RSMo § 571.015 (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County after a jury trial. Appellant also appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. We further find the judgment denying the Rule 29.15 motion is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Young, 928 S.W.2d 405, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1513, 1996 WL 509977 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

928 S.W.2d 405 (State v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 569.020
Missouri § 569.020
§ 571.015
Missouri § 571.015