State v. Wyman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Wyman

43 N.W. 1116, 42 Minn. 182, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 226

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 20, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 43 N.W. 1116 (State v. Wyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wyman, 43 N.W. 1116, 42 Minn. 182, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 226 (Mich. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Vanderburgh, J.

Indictment for selling intoxicating liquors without a license. The first assignment of error is that the indictment does not show that the quantity of liquor sold was less than five gallons. This is the only objection to the indictment. The amount specified as having been so sold is one gill of whiskey. This, however, sufficiently defines the quantity sold, and on the face of the indictment shows that it was within the statutory limit. State v. Lavake, [183]*18326 Minn. 526, (6 N. W. Rep. 339.) The other questions in the caso are such as could only be raised upon a bill of exceptions duly settled and allowed by the trial judge, as required by Gen. St. 1878, c. 117, § 6. But there is no bill of exceptions in the record, and the minutes of the evidence have no place in the record, and cannot be considered here. State v. Miller, 23 Minn. 352.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vanderburgh, J.

Indictment for selling intoxicating liquors without a license. The first assignment of error is that the indictment does not show that the quantity of liquor sold was less than five gallons. This is the only objection to the indictment. The amount specified as having been so sold is one gill of whiskey. This, however, sufficiently defines the quantity sold, and on the face of the indictment shows that it was within the statutory limit. State v. Lavake, [183]*18326 Minn. 526, (6 N. W. Rep. 339.) The other questions in the caso are such as could only be raised upon a bill of exceptions duly settled and allowed by the trial judge, as required by Gen. St. 1878, c. 117, § 6. But there is no bill of exceptions in the record, and the minutes of the evidence have no place in the record, and cannot be considered here. State v. Miller, 23 Minn. 352.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 N.W. 1116, 42 Minn. 182, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wyman-minn-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack