State v. Miller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Miller

23 Minn. 352, 1877 Minn. LEXIS 25

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided February 8, 1877·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Cornell, J.

The question sought to be presented and argued by defendant is not properly before us for consideration. The return to the appeal contains no exceptions taken to “any opinion, direction, or judgment” of the court below, and settled, allowed, and made a part of the judgment roll, as prescribed by Gen. St. c. 117, § 6. Hence, the only question which can be considered upon the record before us is as to the sufficiency of the indictment to support the judgment. As appellant- makes no question of this character, and none is apparent to the court, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cornell, J.

The question sought to be presented and argued by defendant is not properly before us for consideration. The return to the appeal contains no exceptions taken to “any opinion, direction, or judgment” of the court below, and settled, allowed, and made a part of the judgment roll, as prescribed by Gen. St. c. 117, § 6. Hence, the only question which can be considered upon the record before us is as to the sufficiency of the indictment to support the judgment. As appellant- makes no question of this character, and none is apparent to the court, the judgment is affirmed.

State v. Miller, 23 Minn. 352, 1877 Minn. LEXIS 25 (Mich. 1877).

Pincite

23 Minn. 352 (State v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related