State v. Miller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Miller

23 Minn. 352, 1877 Minn. LEXIS 25

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedFebruary 8, 1877

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 23 Minn. 352 (State v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Miller, 23 Minn. 352, 1877 Minn. LEXIS 25 (Mich. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

Cornell, J.

The question sought to be presented and argued by defendant is not properly before us for consideration. The return to the appeal contains no exceptions taken to “any opinion, direction, or judgment” of the court below, and settled, allowed, and made a part of the judgment roll, as prescribed by Gen. St. c. 117, § 6. Hence, the only question which can be considered upon the record before us is as to the sufficiency of the indictment to support the judgment. As appellant- makes no question of this character, and none is apparent to the court, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cornell, J.

The question sought to be presented and argued by defendant is not properly before us for consideration. The return to the appeal contains no exceptions taken to “any opinion, direction, or judgment” of the court below, and settled, allowed, and made a part of the judgment roll, as prescribed by Gen. St. c. 117, § 6. Hence, the only question which can be considered upon the record before us is as to the sufficiency of the indictment to support the judgment. As appellant- makes no question of this character, and none is apparent to the court, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Minn. 352, 1877 Minn. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-miller-minn-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack