State v. Wright

972 S.W.2d 594, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1087, 1998 WL 296608
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 834
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 1998·No. No. 72753·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tammy L. Wright (Defendant) appeals from judgment entered on a jury verdict finding her guilty of forgery in violation of Section 570.090.1(4), RSMo 1994. She was sentenced to a term of three months in custody of the Department of Justice Services of St. Louis County and ordered to pay a fine of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wright, 972 S.W.2d 594, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1087, 1998 WL 296608 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

972 S.W.2d 594 (State v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.