State v. Wright

926 S.W.2d 554, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1327, 1996 WL 422196
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1676
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 30, 1996·No. Nos. 67894, 69468·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Adrian Wright appeals his conviction of murder in the second degree, § 565.021.1(2), RSMo 1994,1 robbery in the first degree § 569.020 and two counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015, with a sentence of 20 years for murder, a consecutive term of 30 years for robbery, and terms of five and ten years for each of the armed criminal action convictions which were ordered to run concurrently with one another and with the sentences of murder and robbery. Wright also appeals the denial, on the merits, without an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion, but no claim of error is alleged or briefed in connection with that appeal and that appeal is deemed to be abandoned. State v. Nelson, 818 S.W.2d 285, 287[1] (Mo.App.1991).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wright, 926 S.W.2d 554, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1327, 1996 WL 422196 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

926 S.W.2d 554 (State v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Nelson
818 S.W.2d 285 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1991)