State v. Wren

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wren

276 S.W.3d 880, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 92, 2009 WL 307500

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 10, 2009

DocketED 91166

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 276 S.W.3d 880 (State v. Wren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wren, 276 S.W.3d 880, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 92, 2009 WL 307500 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

*881 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Gene Tyrone Wren, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident, in violation of section 577.060 RSMo (2000), careless and imprudent driving, in violation of section 304.012 RSMo (2000), and driving without a valid license, in violation of section 302.320 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced defendant to seven years imprisonment for leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident and one year in jail for each of the remaining two offenses, to be served concurrently.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*881 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Gene Tyrone Wren, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident, in violation of section 577.060 RSMo (2000), careless and imprudent driving, in violation of section 304.012 RSMo (2000), and driving without a valid license, in violation of section 302.320 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced defendant to seven years imprisonment for leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident and one year in jail for each of the remaining two offenses, to be served concurrently.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 S.W.3d 880, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 92, 2009 WL 307500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wren-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack