Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Hauser v. MARKETS

Hauser v. MARKETS

276 S.W.3d 880, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 88, 2009 WL 307488
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 10, 2009
DocketED 91517
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 S.W.3d 880 (Hauser v. MARKETS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hauser v. MARKETS, 276 S.W.3d 880, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 88, 2009 WL 307488 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Betty Hauser (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s decision to deny compensation on her occupational disease claim against Dierbergs Markets. We find no grounds upon which to reverse the decision of the Commission. Claimant did not satisfy her burden of proving that she sustained an occupational disease. Accordingly, the Commission did not err in denying Claimant benefits.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the Commission’s decision under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wren
276 S.W.3d 880 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 S.W.3d 880, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 88, 2009 WL 307488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hauser-v-markets-moctapp-2009.