State v. WORMINGTON

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. WORMINGTON

283 S.W.3d 316, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 707, 2009 WL 1450187

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 26, 2009

DocketED 91215

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 S.W.3d 316 (State v. WORMINGTON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. WORMINGTON, 283 S.W.3d 316, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 707, 2009 WL 1450187 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Wormington (hereinafter, “Wormington”) brings this appeal after a jury returned a verdict finding him guilty of driving with a revoked license, Section 302.321 RSMo (2000). 1 Due to Worming-toris prior convictions, the trial court enhanced his sentence to a class D felony pursuant to Section 302.321.2. The trial court sentenced Wormington to four years’ imprisonment. Wormington appeals, alleging there was insufficient evidence for the trial court to enhance his sentence from a misdemeanor to a felony.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All further statutory references herein are to RSMo (2000) unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Wormington (hereinafter, “Wormington”) brings this appeal after a jury returned a verdict finding him guilty of driving with a revoked license, Section 302.321 RSMo (2000). 1 Due to Worming-toris prior convictions, the trial court enhanced his sentence to a class D felony pursuant to Section 302.321.2. The trial court sentenced Wormington to four years’ imprisonment. Wormington appeals, alleging there was insufficient evidence for the trial court to enhance his sentence from a misdemeanor to a felony.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All further statutory references herein are to RSMo (2000) unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 S.W.3d 316, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 707, 2009 WL 1450187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wormington-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack