State v. Flenoid

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Flenoid

283 S.W.3d 316, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 714, 2009 WL 1450295

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 26, 2009

DocketED 91153

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 283 S.W.3d 316 (State v. Flenoid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Flenoid, 283 S.W.3d 316, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 714, 2009 WL 1450295 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Flenoid (Defendant) appeals from his conviction, following a jury trial, of first-degree burglary, in violation of See *317 tion 569.160, RSMo 2000, 1 first-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.020, two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015, unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of Section 571.030.1(4), kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110, and assault in the first degree, in violation of Section 565.050. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior offender according to Section 558.016 and a persistent offender pursuant to Section 588.016, to a life sentence without probation or parole on the murder charge, two life sentences for the armed criminal action charges, thirty years for burglary, thirty years for kidnapping, thirty years for assault, and seven years for the unlawful use of a weapon charge, each to be served consecutively, along with his prior federal sentence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would seive no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All subsequent statutory citations are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Flenoid (Defendant) appeals from his conviction, following a jury trial, of first-degree burglary, in violation of See *317 tion 569.160, RSMo 2000, 1 first-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.020, two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015, unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of Section 571.030.1(4), kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110, and assault in the first degree, in violation of Section 565.050. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior offender according to Section 558.016 and a persistent offender pursuant to Section 588.016, to a life sentence without probation or parole on the murder charge, two life sentences for the armed criminal action charges, thirty years for burglary, thirty years for kidnapping, thirty years for assault, and seven years for the unlawful use of a weapon charge, each to be served consecutively, along with his prior federal sentence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would seive no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All subsequent statutory citations are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 S.W.3d 316, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 714, 2009 WL 1450295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-flenoid-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack