State v. Woods

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Woods

917 S.W.2d 659, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 446, 1996 WL 118052

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Woods. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1378 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 19, 1996·No. No. WD 51443·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Terry Jerome Woods appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.202, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 30.25(b). In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Terry Jerome Woods appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.202, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 30.25(b). In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Woods, 917 S.W.2d 659, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 446, 1996 WL 118052 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

917 S.W.2d 659 (State v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.