State v. Woods

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Woods

875 S.W.2d 251, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 783, 1994 WL 187044

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Woods. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1378 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 17, 1994·No. No. 62958·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial finding her guilty of felony stealing, Section 570.080 RSMo 1986, receiving stolen property, Section 570.080 RSMo 1986, and bribery of a public servant, Section 576.010 RSMo 1986 and the sentences to concurrent terms of five, six and three years respectively.

An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only. This memorandum sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed according to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial finding her guilty of felony stealing, Section 570.080 RSMo 1986, receiving stolen property, Section 570.080 RSMo 1986, and bribery of a public servant, Section 576.010 RSMo 1986 and the sentences to concurrent terms of five, six and three years respectively.

An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only. This memorandum sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed according to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Woods, 875 S.W.2d 251, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 783, 1994 WL 187044 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

875 S.W.2d 251 (State v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.