State v. Woodall

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Woodall

619 So. 2d 561, 1993 La. LEXIS 1905, 1993 WL 219177

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 18, 1993

DocketNo. 93-KH-1468

StatusPublished

This text of 619 So. 2d 561 (State v. Woodall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Woodall, 619 So. 2d 561, 1993 La. LEXIS 1905, 1993 WL 219177 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Woodall, Ray T., Jr.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “6”, No. 259-043.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for clarification with supplement and motions for subpoenas he has failed in December of 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motions.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Woodall, Ray T., Jr.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “6”, No. 259-043.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for clarification with supplement and motions for subpoenas he has failed in December of 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motions.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 So. 2d 561, 1993 La. LEXIS 1905, 1993 WL 219177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-woodall-la-1993.