State v. Woodall

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Woodall

619 So. 2d 561, 1993 La. LEXIS 1905, 1993 WL 219177

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 18, 1993·No. No. 93-KH-1468·Published

Opinion

In re Woodall, Ray T., Jr.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “6”, No. 259-043.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for clarification with supplement and motions for subpoenas he has failed in December of 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motions.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Woodall, Ray T., Jr.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “6”, No. 259-043.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for clarification with supplement and motions for subpoenas he has failed in December of 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motions.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

State v. Woodall, 619 So. 2d 561, 1993 La. LEXIS 1905, 1993 WL 219177 (La. 1993).

Pincite

619 So. 2d 561 (State v. Woodall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.