State v. Woodall

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Woodall

590 So. 2d 1187, 1992 La. LEXIS 166, 1992 WL 4133

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 7, 1992

DocketNo. 91-KH-2931

StatusPublished

This text of 590 So. 2d 1187 (State v. Woodall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Woodall, 590 So. 2d 1187, 1992 La. LEXIS 166, 1992 WL 4133 (La. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Woodall, Ray T., Jr.; — Defendants); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 259-043.

The relator represents that the district court has . failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed on or about April 5, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Woodall, Ray T., Jr.; — Defendants); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 259-043.

The relator represents that the district court has . failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed on or about April 5, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

590 So. 2d 1187, 1992 La. LEXIS 166, 1992 WL 4133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-woodall-la-1992.