State v. Wogenstahl

109 N.E.3d 1258, 2018 Ohio 4288, 153 Ohio St. 3d 1502
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 24, 2018·No. 1995-0042·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

On appellant's motion to reopen direct appeal. Motion denied. Appellant's amended motion for clarification granted. Appellant's amended motion for extension of stay of execution granted. The stay shall remain in effect until exhaustion of all state postconviction proceedings, including any appeals.

French, J., would grant appellant's motion to reopen.

O'Connor, C.J., and Kennedy, J., would deny appellant's amended motion for clarification and appellant's amended motion for extension of stay of execution.

O'Donnell, J., would deny appellant's amended motion for extension of stay of execution.

Donna J. Carr, J., of the Ninth District Court of Appeals, sitting for Fischer, J.

Eileen T. Gallagher, J., of the Eighth District Court of Appeals, sitting for DeWine, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wogenstahl, 109 N.E.3d 1258, 2018 Ohio 4288, 153 Ohio St. 3d 1502 (Ohio 2018).

109 N.E.3d 1258 (State v. Wogenstahl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Wogenstahl
2024 Ohio 4714 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2024)