State v. Wogenstahl
This text of 103 N.E.3d 829 (State v. Wogenstahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On appellant's motion for order or relief pursuant to S.C.Prac.R. 4.01. Motion denied.
O'Connor, C.J., and O'Donnell, Kennedy, Carr, Gallagher, and DeGenaro, JJ., concur.
French, J., concurs and would state that S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.01(A)(1) offers no basis for filing this motion.
Donna J. Carr, J., of the Ninth District Court of Appeals, sitting for Fischer, J.
Eileen T. Gallagher, J., of the Eighth District Court of Appeals, sitting for DeWine, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 N.E.3d 829, 2018 Ohio 3025, 153 Ohio St. 3d 1449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wogenstahl-ohio-2018.