State v. Witt

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Witt

365 S.W.3d 311, 2012 WL 1500066, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 599

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 1, 2012

DocketWD 73837

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 365 S.W.3d 311 (State v. Witt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Witt, 365 S.W.3d 311, 2012 WL 1500066, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 599 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Justin Witt appeals his conviction for attempted statutory rape, section 566.034, RSMo, and sentence of four years imprisonment. He contends that the trial court plainly erred in allowing a sheriffs deputy to testify about the statement given by the victim. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Justin Witt appeals his conviction for attempted statutory rape, section 566.034, RSMo, and sentence of four years imprisonment. He contends that the trial court plainly erred in allowing a sheriffs deputy to testify about the statement given by the victim. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 S.W.3d 311, 2012 WL 1500066, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-witt-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack