Livingston v. State
365 S.W.3d 311, 2012 WL 1499904, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 603
Opinion
ORDER
Lance Livingston appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would have no precedential value; however, a memoran *312 dum explaining the reason for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Livingston v. State, 365 S.W.3d 311, 2012 WL 1499904, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 603 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
365 S.W.3d 311 (Livingston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Witt
365 S.W.3d 311 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)