State v. Winn

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Winn

881 N.E.2d 273, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1405

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 20, 2008·No. 2007-1842·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 21710, 173 Ohio App.3d 202, 2007-Ohio-4327. Discretionary cross-appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, and Cupp, JJ., would also hold the cause for the decision in 2007-0595 and 2007-0651, State v. Cabrales, Hamilton App. No. C-050682, 2007-Ohio-857. Lanzinger, J., would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. III. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal not accepted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery App. No. 21710, 173 Ohio App.3d 202, 2007-Ohio-4327. Discretionary cross-appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, and Cupp, JJ., would also hold the cause for the decision in 2007-0595 and 2007-0651, State v. Cabrales, Hamilton App. No. C-050682, 2007-Ohio-857. Lanzinger, J., would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. III. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal not accepted.

State v. Winn, 881 N.E.2d 273, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

881 N.E.2d 273 (State v. Winn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related