State v. Winn

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Winn

881 N.E.2d 273, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1405

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 20, 2008

Docket2007-1842

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 881 N.E.2d 273 (State v. Winn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Winn, 881 N.E.2d 273, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 21710, 173 Ohio App.3d 202, 2007-Ohio-4327. Discretionary cross-appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, and Cupp, JJ., would also hold the cause for the decision in 2007-0595 and 2007-0651, State v. Cabrales, Hamilton App. No. C-050682, 2007-Ohio-857. Lanzinger, J., would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. III. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal not accepted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery App. No. 21710, 173 Ohio App.3d 202, 2007-Ohio-4327. Discretionary cross-appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, and Cupp, JJ., would also hold the cause for the decision in 2007-0595 and 2007-0651, State v. Cabrales, Hamilton App. No. C-050682, 2007-Ohio-857. Lanzinger, J., would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. III. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal not accepted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

881 N.E.2d 273, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-winn-ohio-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack