State v. Wingo

309 S.W.3d 874, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 632
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wingo. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1040
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 2010·No. No. ED 93519·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dwayne Wingo (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020.1 The trial court sentenced Defendant to twenty-six years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the remaining claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wingo, 309 S.W.3d 874, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 632 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

309 S.W.3d 874 (State v. Wingo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.