State v. Wingo
323 S.W.3d 465, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1435, 2010 WL 4196014
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wingo. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1040 →
Opinion
*466 ORDER
Defendant, Dwayne Wingo, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Wingo, 323 S.W.3d 465, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1435, 2010 WL 4196014 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
323 S.W.3d 465 (State v. Wingo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.