State v. Wilson

303 S.W.3d 637, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 204, 2010 WL 623688
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1459
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 2010·No. ED 93022·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andre Wilson (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of first-degree assault, first-degree robbery, endangering the welfare of a child, and two counts of armed criminal action. Defendant argues that the trial court erred by denying his Batson challenge to one of the State’s peremptory strikes.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a. memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wilson, 303 S.W.3d 637, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 204, 2010 WL 623688 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

303 S.W.3d 637 (State v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Senter v. Home Care Assistance of St. Louis, LLC
303 S.W.3d 637 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)