Senter v. Home Care Assistance of St. Louis, LLC

303 S.W.3d 637, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, 2010 WL 623697
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 2010·No. ED 92656·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*638 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Home Care Assistance of St. Louis, LLC (“Appellant”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis awarding damages to George Senter (“Respondent”). We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Senter v. Home Care Assistance of St. Louis, LLC, 303 S.W.3d 637, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, 2010 WL 623697 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

303 S.W.3d 637 (Senter v. Home Care Assistance of St. Louis, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Wilson
303 S.W.3d 637 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)