State v. Williams

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 351 S.C. 591
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided February 11, 2004·No. 2004-UP-069·Unpublished

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

Gregory Williams,        Appellant.


Appeal From Richland County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-069
Submitted November 19, 2003 – Filed February 11, 2004


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. 

Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Gregory Williams appeals his guilty plea to possession of a stolen vehicle and second degree burglary.  Counsel for Williams attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Williams did not file a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, (S.C. Ct. App. 2004).

State v. Williams (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Williams
406 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)