State v. Williams

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 15, 2004
Docket2004-UP-015
StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Williams (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Williams, (S.C. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

Mark Andrew Williams,        Appellant.


Appeal From Greenville County
John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-015
Submitted November 19, 2003 – Filed January 15, 2004


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, of Columbia, and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant, Mark Andrew Williams, was indicted for possession of crack cocaine.  Following a jury trial, Williams was convicted as charged and sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment and a $15,000 fine.  We dismiss pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991).  Counsel’s petition to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Williams
406 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-scctapp-2004.