State v. Williams
Opinion
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ISAAC WILLIAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Michael R. Klekman, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).
Mr. Philip B. Seaton, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Thomas B. Shusted, Camden County Prosecutor, attorney).
Mr. Robert E. Rochford, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.
*2 For affirmance Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER 6.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
379 A.2d 233 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.