State v. Williams

386 S.W.3d 235, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1508, 2012 WL 5907441
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 309
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 27, 2012·No. No. WD 74297·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Johnnie J. Williams appeals his conviction following a jury trial for felony driving while suspended in violation of Section 802.321, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011. In his [236]*236sole point on appeal, Williams claims that the trial court plainly erred in admitting copies of his driving records from the Missouri Department of Revenue because, (1) they contained hearsay, including results of blood alcohol tests, and (2) Williams was prejudiced because no other evidence proved that his license was suspended or that the suspension that the Department of Revenue sent notice of was valid, both of which Williams contested. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 386 S.W.3d 235, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1508, 2012 WL 5907441 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

386 S.W.3d 235 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.