State v. Williams

377 S.W.3d 616, 2012 WL 3950790, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1102
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 309
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 11, 2012·No. No. ED 97306·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Maurice Williams (Williams) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of misdemeanor stealing. Williams asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal because the record contains insufficient evidence to support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for misdemeanor stealing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of prejudicial error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 377 S.W.3d 616, 2012 WL 3950790, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1102 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

377 S.W.3d 616 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.