State v. Williams

376 S.W.3d 707, 2012 WL 3805557, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 309
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 4, 2012·No. No. ED 97727·Published

Opinion

[708]*708 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Williams appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of stealing under $500.00 and second-degree property damage. We find that there was sufficient evidence to support his convictions, and the verdict was not coerced. We also find that the trial court did not plainly err in sentencing Williams as a prior and persistent offender. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 376 S.W.3d 707, 2012 WL 3805557, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

376 S.W.3d 707 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.