State v. Williams

948 S.W.2d 258, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1234, 1997 WL 369928
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1846
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 8, 1997·No. Nos. 67131, 70769·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after his conviction by a jury of one count of second degree murder, Section 565.021, RSMo 1986, and one count of armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 1986. Defendant failed to address any points on appeal to his direct appeal. Therefore, that appeal is considered abandoned. State v. Brooks, 916 S.W.2d 454, 455 (Mo.App. E.D.1996).Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 948 S.W.2d 258, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1234, 1997 WL 369928 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

948 S.W.2d 258 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brooks
916 S.W.2d 454 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996)